So here I am, back where I started, after three frustrating years trying to mold Arbitration Forums' material damage procedures to little avail. Now I am free to file and respond as I see fit without the strictures of being both a customer and a Panelist. I will continue to fight for proper material damage case handling and respond vigorously to each poor or erroneous decision. More later...
An apologia on the making of an acceptable photographic file. One hears from lay people and even some photographers a disdain for image manipulation, particularly using modern programs such as Photoshop, and it's ilk. I used to be one of the latter. I was all about the "in camera manipulation", ie, get the composition and exposure as close as possible to the desired result before pressing th e shutter release, then print as-is. This may have been because I had only a primitive darkroom, and depended on commercial labs for prints, with all the attendant miscommunications about the final look. I have since learned otherwise. Since photography was discovered/invented the making of a visible print was the obvious goal. Early photographers had to go through great efforts with bulky equipment and hazardous chemicals to produce an acceptable product. That is to say, from the beginning, there has been no way to make a print directly from the camera w...
Comments
Post a Comment